While current data exist, the particular pandemic-related experiences of sexual minority Latinx (SML) adults have not been highlighted in those studies. We investigated disparities in economic and household stress, social support, mental health symptoms (depression and anxiety), alcohol and substance use patterns between sexual minority and non-sexual minority Latinx adults in the United States, focusing on variations in sexual identity.
Primary data were acquired via the AmeriSpeak panel, a national probability sample of 2286 Latinx adults located in the U.S. A noteworthy .34% of this sample identified as sexual minorities. This schema produces sentences in a list format.
After a comprehensive count, the conclusive outcome is 465. Data acquisition occurred throughout the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, spanning from November 2020 to January 2021.
Economic and household distress, mental health symptoms, and alcohol and substance misuse were more prevalent among SML Latinx adults in comparison to their nonsexual minority counterparts. A significant association was observed between economic stress and the escalation of mental health symptoms, alcohol use, and substance use in SML adults. The presence or absence of social support affected the relationship between economic stress and both mental health symptoms and substance use, but not in relation to alcohol use.
Studies during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted unique intersectional challenges faced by SML adults, underscoring the need for social support and the negative influence of economic strain on their mental health and substance use. The APA's PsycINFO database record, from 2023, retains all its copyright protections.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought into sharp focus unique intersectional aspects affecting SML adults, highlighting the significance of social support and the detrimental effects of economic hardship on mental well-being and substance use. This record, PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2023 APA, grants exclusive rights for the usage of its content.
The Maori Cultural Embeddedness Scale (MaCES), a self-report instrument for measuring Māori cultural embeddedness, is presented in this article; it is underpinned by theoretical and qualitative research on the subject.
Responding to a survey comprising 49 items specifically designed to assess elements of Maori cultural values, beliefs, and traditions, 548 adults self-identified as Maori. Analysis of the data was performed using confirmatory factor analysis, and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine invariance.
The measurement process was refined by removing six items, which exhibited weak associations with the latent factor, unclear language, or contentious subject matter. When the 43 remaining items are grouped according to three primary factors (Values, Beliefs, and Practices), and then broken down into secondary subfactors, they demonstrably fit the data. Our investigation also revealed that this sophisticated subfactor model exhibited no variation depending on whether participants identified solely as Maori, or in a mixed manner, as well as regardless of whether their upbringing occurred in urban or rural locales. Our results suggest the structural validity of the MaCES, yet continued validation, incorporating convergent and divergent comparisons with other scales, is essential for future applications.
Exploring the diverse ways embeddedness in Maori culture shapes different outcomes is enabled by the MaCES, a theoretically derived and statistically sound measure presenting substantial research potential. Copyright for the PsycINFO database record from 2023 belongs exclusively to the APA.
A statistically sound and theoretically derived measure, the MaCES, offers considerable research potential for investigating the ways Māori cultural embeddedness influences varied outcomes. The PsycInfo Database Record, a 2023 APA creation, is hereby returned.
The present study investigates the association between substance use disorders (SUDs) and the intersection of racial/ethnic and gender-based discrimination. Subsequently, this research intends to explore if the connection between substance use disorders and discrimination varies according to race/ethnicity and gender.
Data from a diverse group of adult respondents (American Indian, Asian, Black, Latinx, and White) are analyzed in this cross-sectional study.
From Wave 2 of the 2004-2005 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, the statistic = 34547) emerged. To determine the relationship between intersectional discrimination and SUD, the researchers performed a multinomial logistic regression. Intersectionality in discrimination was quantified using an interaction term between racial/ethnic and gender bias. Alcohol use disorders (AUD) and alcohol plus drug use disorders (SUD) were evaluated independently. To categorize the analyses, race/ethnicity and gender were used as stratification variables.
Discrimination affecting multiple intersecting identities demonstrated a correlation with increased anticipated probabilities of substance use disorders (SUD), exceeding those without discrimination, and showed a stronger link to SUDs than to alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Increased predicted probabilities of AUD and SUD were observed in women, Black, Latinx, and White adults subjected to intersecting forms of discrimination. Increased predicted probabilities of substance use disorder (SUD), but not alcohol use disorder (AUD), were observed among American Indian and Asian men who experienced intersecting forms of discrimination.
Intersectional discrimination consistently resulted in higher rates of AUD and/or SUD across subgroups determined by gender or race/ethnicity, though the specific impact varied significantly based on the individual's gender, race/ethnicity, and type of substance use disorder. helminth infection The negative health outcomes associated with intersectional discrimination affect American Indian, Asian, Black, Latinx, and White men and women, as demonstrated by the findings. Policies and interventions must be intersectional in nature, as suggested by the study's findings.
Elevations in AUD and/or SUD rates were consistently observed within subgroups defined by the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity, yet the impact of this intersectional discrimination varied significantly depending on the specific gender, racial/ethnic group, and type of substance use disorder. The detrimental impact of intersectional discrimination on the well-being of American Indian, Asian, Black, Latinx, and White men and women is evident in the research. The research's conclusions have ramifications for developing policies and interventions grounded in intersectionality.
In the United States, interracial marriages involving Asian women and white men, and black men and white women, are notably prevalent. Research from the past proposed that these pairings are a product of racial preferences held by White Americans; White men are more inclined to prefer Asian women than Black women (that is, the group viewed as more feminine), whereas White women exhibit a preference for Black men over Asian men (namely, the group often perceived as more masculine). We contend that a concentration on the preferences of White Americans overlooks the fact that Americans of color also possess preferences (and convictions regarding the preferences of others) which impact the formation of interracial relationships within the United States.
Utilizing experimental manipulations and surveys, we sought to understand the perceptions of Asian, Black, and White Americans regarding the preferences of others.
Taking into account the results of three research endeavors,
Our investigation of 3728 participants reveals that Asian, Black, and White Americans have beliefs about the preferences of other people (Study 1). Their beliefs accurately predict their personal preferences (Study 2), and these beliefs affect their subsequent personal preferences (Study 3).
These findings collectively suggest that these beliefs (and preferences) create a benefit for White Americans, as both Asian and Black Americans feel they are more appealing to White Americans than to each other, ultimately causing increased attraction to White Americans. This PsycINFO database record, issued in 2023 by the APA, is subject to all copyright protections.
Collectively, these results highlight that such beliefs (and preferences) are advantageous to White Americans, since both Asian and Black Americans perceive themselves as more attractive to White Americans than their respective racial groups, thus creating a stronger attraction towards White Americans. APA, the holder of copyright for the PsycInfo Database Record, asserts ownership in 2023.
Our research investigated whether a helping skills course augmented counseling self-efficacy, while exploring any potential connection between instructor effects and the resulting post-course self-efficacy of the students. Our survey, conducted across three semesters at a large public university in the mid-Atlantic United States, involved 551 undergraduate students and 27 trainers enrolled in helping skills courses. Students' reported counseling self-efficacy levels were observed to be considerably higher after the course's completion. Trainers' influence on changes in counseling self-efficacy was also discernible, accounting for a small yet important portion of the variance (7%). Bio-based nanocomposite Increases in students' counseling self-efficacy were demonstrably connected to the instructors' authoritative teaching style, yet their facilitative interpersonal skills were not, as the evidence shows. The implications for training programs in helping skills are analyzed and expounded upon. In 2023, the PsycINFO Database Record is protected by the copyright held by APA.
Psychotherapy patients with erratic early distress readings tend to display notable progress between therapy sessions. A question of ambiguity persists regarding the relationship between early distress instability and subsequent outcomes, as evidenced by the data. Glycyrrhizin Our investigation examined the relationships between early distress instability, later intersession improvement, and the final outcome. Among 1796 university students receiving brief psychotherapy at university counseling centers, we sought to forecast intersession improvement and treatment success from an index of distress instability, monitored during their first four therapy sessions.